![]() | |
Negative Yields Report for 02/27/2008 | |
On Trade Date 02/27/2008 licensed broker/dealers sold Municipal Bonds to investors with negative yields. Here is the full list of those bonds.
The Red Flag
indicates the bid/offer market spread for this Municipal Bond exceeded 4 points.
Red numbering in the Bid or Offer column indicates the spread between high and low price exceeded 1 point.
Red numbering in the Yield column indicates a negative yield.
| CUSIP | Municipal Bond Name / Description | Coupon | Maturity | Bid Side Customer Sold to Dealer |
|
Offer Side Customer Purchase from Dealer |
Yield* Offer Side |
# of Trades |
Volume (000) |
| RICHMOND VA MET AUTH EXPWY REV | 5.400% | 01/15/2013 | | | | 1 | 40 | ||
| MICHIGAN ST HOSP FIN AUTH REV REF-HOSP-ST JOHN HOSP-SER A | 6.000% | 05/15/2013 | | | | 2 | 28 | ||
| BREVARD CNTY FLA HEALTH FACS AUTH REV HOLMES REGL MED CTR PROJ | 5.625% | 10/01/2014 | | | | 4 | 80 | ||
| POINTE COUPEE PARISH LA POLLUTN CTL REV REF-GULF STATES UTILS CO PROJ | 6.700% | 03/01/2013 | | | | 3 | 30 | ||
| PUERTO RICO NEW PUB HSG AUTH | 5.750% | 06/01/2011 | | | | 2 | 20 | ||
| NEW JERSEY ECONOMIC DEV AUTH WTR FACS REV N J AMERICAN WTR CO INC PJ | 6.000% | 05/01/2036 | | | | 1 | 20 | ||
| PUERTO RICO NEW PUB HSG AUTH | 5.000% | 06/01/2012 | | | | 1 | 50 | ||
| RHODE ISLAND CLEAN WTR PROTN FIN AGY WTR POLLUTN CTL REV UNREFUNDED BALANCE-SER A | 5.900% | 10/01/2010 | | | | 2 | 70 | ||
| ALAMEDA CNTY CALIF CTFS PARTN ALAMEDA CNTY MED CTR PJ | 5.375% | 06/01/2017 | | | | 1 | 20 | ||
| NEW YORK ST | 5.250% | 05/01/2021 | | | | 1 | 20 | ||
| ENTERPRISE CMNTY DEV DIST FLA SPL ASSMT | 6.100% | 05/01/2016 | | | | 4 | 80 | ||
| GREATER JOHNSTOWN PA SCH DIST | 5.000% | 02/01/2013 | | | | 2 | 30 | ||
| NEW YORK ST DORM AUTH ST PERS INCOME TAX REV HEAL NY-SER A | 5.000% | 03/15/2013 | | | | 2 | 250+1 | ||
| BALTIMORE MD TAXABLE-CONS PUB IMPT-SER B | 7.250% | 10/15/2012 | | | | 3 | 570 | ||
| NEW YORK ST ENVIRONMENTAL FACS CORP POLLUTN CTL REV UNREFUNDED-ST WTR REVOLV FD-C | 5.550% | 01/15/2009 | | | | 2 | 150 | ||
| SAN DIEGO CALIF SWR REV SER A-MBIA-IBC | 5.250% | 05/15/2020 | | | | 4 | 160 | ||
| GUAM GOVT UNREFUND BAL-A-ASSET GTY-IBCC | 5.400% | 11/15/2018 | | | | 3 | 30 | ||
| NEW YORK ST ENERGY RESH & DEV AUTH GAS FACS REV BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO PJ-SER A | 5.500% | 01/01/2021 | | | | 5 | 1390 | ||
| CONNECTICUT ST HEALTH & EDL FACS AUTH REV NEW BRITAIN GEN HOSP-SER B | 6.000% | 07/01/2024 | | | | 2 | 70 | ||
| FERRIS ST UNIV MICH REV UNREFUNDED BAL-GEN | 4.900% | 10/01/2011 | | | | 1 | 80 | ||
| HAMPTON VA TAXABLE-PUB IMPT-SER B | 7.000% | 08/01/2013 | | | | 1 | 20 | ||
| NEW YORK N Y NEW PUB HSG AUTH | 5.000% | 01/01/2010 | | | | 1 | 25 | ||
| DERRY TWP PA MUN AUTH SWR REV GTD | 6.400% | 12/01/2013 | | | | 1 | 10 | ||
| SAN MATEO CNTY CALIF TRAN DIST SER A | 4.400% | 06/01/2012 | | | | 4 | 500 | ||
| NEW YORK N Y UNREFUNDED BALANCE-SER C | 5.500% | 11/15/2037 | | | | 5 | 150 | ||
| TOBACCO SETTLEMENT FING CORP N Y REV ASSET BKD-SER B-1C | 5.000% | 06/01/2011 | | | | 3 | 1650 | ||
| SAN DIEGO CALIF PUB FACS FING AUTH SWR REV | 5.000% | 05/15/2015 | | | | 3 | 165 | ||
| NOTTINGHAM CTRY MUN UTIL DIST TEX | 5.250% | 09/01/2011 | | | | 1 | 100 | ||
| PORT AUTH N Y & N J CONS-ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH SER | 5.250% | 10/01/2015 | | | | 5 | 225 | ||
| MICHIGAN ST HOSP FIN AUTH REV REF-ST JOHN HLTH SYS-SER A | 5.000% | 05/15/2018 | | | | 2 | 600 | ||
| FAYETTE CNTY KY SCH DIST FIN CORP SCH BLDG REV REF-SER C | 5.250% | 10/01/2009 | | | | 3 | 55 | ||
| CALIFORNIA ST | 3.700% | 04/01/2014 | | | | 1 | 15 |
These reports represent inter-dealer and customer trades in municipal securities that have been reported by dealers to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The reports do not necessarily reflect all transactions that were effected on the specific trade date. Because of the possibility of errors in the trade submission process or errors or omissions in other processing of data, the reports should not be used as the sole basis for pricing or executing transactions in municipal securities. Prices for securities transactions vary with market conditions and can be affected by trade size and other factors.
Data provided by: